[discuss] Fwd: Re: [governance] Humans Need Not Apply: The Robots are Coming (Actually they are already here
parminder at itforchange.net
Sat Aug 16 07:22:17 UTC 2014
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [governance] Humans Need Not Apply: The Robots are Coming
(Actually they are already here
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:23:29 +0530
From: parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>
Reply-To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org,parminder
<parminder at itforchange.net>
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
A much bigger problem than of allocating technology provided gains
between work (along with over consumption) and leisure (with more
controlled consumption) is of the allocation between different groups
and classes of people, and between different geo-regions. It is a
completely inexcusable crime of all those who participate in the
management of our societies today that even with such stupendous
technology/ productivity gains, about 13 percent of the world's
population still goes to bed hungry, and more than 30 percent of the
children in developing countries are stunted due to malnourishment (In
India, close to 40 percent). Nearly half the world's population lives on
less that 2.5 dollars a day.
"The world produces enough food to feed everyone...... the principal
underlying cause of poverty and hunger is the ordinary operation of the
economic and political systems in the world. Essentially control over
resources and income is based on military, political and economic power
that typically ends up in the hands of a minority, who live well, while
those at the bottom barely survive, if they do."
Meanwhile, wealth disparities are rising globally, at most places very
rapidly. A recent report says that "the lower half of the global
population possesses barely 1% of global wealth, while the richest 10%
of adults own 86% of all wealth, and the top 1% account for 46% of the
total. " And the concentration of wealth is worsening almost everywhere.
Nice time one would say to attempt to move the locus of global Internet
governance to the World Economic Forum <http://t.co/xUxOf0AvLl>, that
Mecca of the 1 percent, where 'they' develop blue prints for where the
world should go from here. We certainly need their advice and leadership
for shaping and governing the global Internet. Power on the Internet
isnt already concentrated enough!
One can only congratulate all those involved with the initiative, and
those contributing to it!
Poor those who have been trying to occupy places that signified wealth
concentration - the occupy movement. It appears that it is the civil
society that is getting occupied in reverse. And it is running into the
trap gleefully, with open arms.
On Saturday 16 August 2014 09:11 AM, Thomas Lowenhaupt wrote:
> Long ago I thought this problem could be solved by reallocating
> resources: The availability of farm machinery has created more food
> than we know what to do with; and half of New York seems to be filled
> with storage bins filled with the abundance of manufactured goods. And
> I thought that people be happy to retire at 30.
> But assuming an abundance of energy and no environmental limitations,
> would I like a 50 year retirement? These days I seem to live for my
> work. If some machine takes it away, I'd be left with a diminished life.
> How important is work to most peoples lives?
> Yes, I agree with the video, and the clock seems to be ticking.
> By posting on the governance list are you suggesting that Internet
> governance and "technology management" be combined?
> Tom Lowenhaupt
> On 8/15/2014 6:42 PM, michael gurstein wrote:
>> So what do we do?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
For all other list information and functions, see:
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the discuss