[discuss] Call to 1net community - Shape IGF Best Practices!
bommelaer at isoc.org
Sat Aug 23 10:41:35 UTC 2014
Many thanks for your careful review.
Please visit the IGF's Review Platform where you can post your comments,
and they will be taken into account by the Secretariat:
On 8/22/14 10:57 PM, "S Moonesamy" <sm+1net at elandsys.com> wrote:
>At 04:05 22-08-2014, Constance Bommelaer wrote:
>>2. Regulation and mitigation of unwanted communications (e.g. "spam")
>Item 59 mentions an industry consortium. I do not like that anyone
>from a developing country would find it affordable to spend U.S.
>$12,500 to be part of that consortium.
>Item 73 mentions the African Union Convention on Cyberspace Security
>and Protection of Personal Data. There has been some concerns about
>the draft from people in Africa.
>Item 98 mentions that "Work is ongoing in the IETF community to
>develop recommendations to help deal with the spam situations". I
>have participated in mail-related discussions. I am not aware of any
>ongoing work in the IETF community to develop recommendations to deal
>with the spam situations. The IETF does not have "an active spam
>discussion group that promotes information exchange on the
>topic". The information provided in that item might mislead people
>from developing countries.
>Item 148 mentions the differences between the developing and the
>developed world. The mailing list for a group cited in the IGF
>document is at
>are only two messages for this year. One of the messages was a reply
>to a message which was posted in September 2013. I would not
>consider that group as active. The problem in the developing world
>is that there are foreign experts selling solutions which are not
>adapted to the local context.
>>5. Best practices for online child protection
>Item 10 mentions that "In the developing world higher overall levels
>of violence and lower rates of Internet accessibility result in
>different child protection priorities for stakeholders. In
>particular, child protection online has diminished value in the face
>of prevailing offline threats of physical violence, sexual assault,
>slavery, and child soldiery". This paints a very negative picture of
>the developing world. Is child soldiery widespread in the developing
>world? The sexual assault rate for Sweden (used as an example) is
>high compared to the rate for some developing countries.
>A number of issues involving children have been traced back to social
>networking sites. The IGF document does not mention that at all.
More information about the discuss