[discuss] Interesting article

Tue Jan 14 15:05:10 UTC 2014

Sorry Jorge, but we must be clear for all the people who try to understand:

Icann IS IN CHARGE of Iana, and for several years!
See: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/page/iana-functions-purchase-order

Without Iana contract, Icann would not be a political issue.

@+, Dominique

Le 14/01/14 15:54, Jorge Amodio a écrit :
> Then talk about IANA, not ICANN.
>
> -J
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:
>
>> OK, Jorge, but is precisely the IANA function that is left to be
>> "internationalized", or "deamericanized". The rest of the Icann "job
>> description" (Icann's "meaning of life" is its contracts or operational
>> agreements with NTIA/USA) is already, if not internationalized, at least
>> quite decentralized (e.g, RIRs/NRO).
>>
>> frt rgds
>>
>> --c.a.
>>
>> On 01/14/2014 12:42 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Roland Perry
>>> <roland at internetpolicyagency.com
>>> <mailto:roland at internetpolicyagency.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     In message
>>>     <
>> CAMzo+1bYKXDJVt___zckNGnacn32j4qwEXXGsV8L3YMo2ts__Yd3XQ at mail.gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:
>> CAMzo%2B1bYKXDJVt_zckNGnacn32j4qwEXXGsV8L3YMo2tsYd3XQ at mail.gmail.com>>,
>>>     at 07:37:24 on Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:jmamodio at gmail.com>> writes
>>>
>>>         I'm not sure what do you mean about "requirements of US
>> government".
>>>
>>>     If you read the tender documents for the latest IANA contract,
>>>     you'll find quite a bit of (very US-centric) stuff about the
>>>     required geographic credentials of any qualifying organisation (and
>>>     certain of its staff).
>>>
>>>
>>> I read all 65 pages of it, and this is true ONLY as the contractor for
>>> the IANA function, regardless if it is ICANN or not.
>>>
>>> Being ICANN the contractor has probably some positives, but on the other
>>> hand confuses a lot of people since the role as a contractor and policy
>>> development and other roles are (or are supposed to be) totally separate.
>>>
>>> So if you abstract the IANA contract, besides the requirements as
>>> US/California non-profit corporation there are no other requirements
>>> from the USG.
>>>
>>> So the US-centric issue is not ICANN, but IANA.
>>>
>>> -J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at 1net.org
>>> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

  * Anglais - détecté
  * Afrikaans
  * Albanais
  * Arabe
  * Biélorusse
  * Bulgare
  * Catalan
  * Chinois
  * Chinois (Simplifié)
  * Chinois (Traditionnel)
  * Croate
  * Tchèque
  * Danois
  * Néerlandais
  * Estonien
  * Filipino
  * Finnois
  * Galicien
  * Allemand
  * Grec
  * Hébreu
  * Haïtien
  * Hindi
  * Hongrois
  * Islandais
  * Indonésien
  * Irlandais
  * Italien
  * Japonais
  * Coréen
  * Letton
  * Lituanien
  * Macédonien
  * Malais
  * Maltais
  * Norvégien
  * Persan
  * Polonais
  * Portugais
  * Portugais ibérique
  * Roumain
  * Russe
  * Serbe
  * Slovaque
  * Slovène
  * Espagnol
  * Swahili
  * Suédois
  * Thaï
  * Turc
  * Ukrainien
  * Vietnamien
  * Gallois
  * Yiddish
  * Français

  * Afrikaans
  * Albanais
  * Arabe
  * Biélorusse
  * Bulgare
  * Catalan
  * Chinois
  * Chinois (Simplifié)
  * Chinois (Traditionnel)
  * Croate
  * Tchèque
  * Danois
  * Néerlandais
  * Estonien
  * Filipino
  * Finnois
  * Galicien
  * Allemand
  * Grec
  * Hébreu
  * Haïtien
  * Hindi
  * Hongrois
  * Islandais
  * Indonésien
  * Irlandais
  * Italien
  * Japonais
  * Coréen
  * Letton
  * Lituanien
  * Macédonien
  * Malais
  * Maltais
  * Norvégien
  * Persan
  * Polonais
  * Portugais
  * Portugais ibérique
  * Roumain
  * Russe
  * Serbe
  * Slovaque
  * Slovène
  * Espagnol
  * Swahili
  * Suédois
  * Thaï
  * Turc
  * Ukrainien
  * Vietnamien
  * Gallois
  * Yiddish
  * Français

<javascript:void(0);>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140114/758d7719/attachment.html>