[discuss] Options for root zone (was Re: Interesting article)

Fri Jan 17 09:33:25 UTC 2014

On Friday 17 January 2014 10:25 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> snip
>
> And to be frank talking about arguments, I'm getting sick tired of the 
> "highly over-used argument" of "bad US, bad US"

No, US is a pretty great nation and people..... What I am sick of is the 
emergence of US as the political capital of the world

see for instance 
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/15/google-privacy-claim-uk-british-court-california

The fact that a transnational elite class supports such an arrangement 
is even more problematic...

I believe in the maxim - 'no legislation without representation', a take 
on 'no taxation without representation ', a slogan that fired the great 
democratic revolution in the US...

regards
parminder
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:16 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net 
> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>
>
>     On Thursday 16 January 2014 03:52 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
>         Under the current architecture and state of affairs tell me at
>         least one instance in the 30+ years of existence of the DNS
>         where the USG has used or threaten to use it's alleged
>         "control" of the root zone.
>
>
>     One doesnt leave ones house unlocked, even re checking a few
>     times, just because there has not been a proven case of attempted
>     burglary on the house in the last 30+ years....Frankly, I find
>     this highly over-used argument of 'US has never done it' rather
>     facile and hollow, apart from being very disrespectful of other
>     countries.
>
>     parminder
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140117/ba057276/attachment.html>