[discuss] surveillance governance, was Re: [governance] NTIA statement

Tue Mar 18 15:24:58 UTC 2014

Hi,

that is not the way the Internet's successful multistakeholder governance
mechanisms have emerged - no need to ask for a higher, central, global
authority for permission. In fact, the pieces of it that exist had to be
circumvented in order to get the Internet to expand. The top-down
authorization echoes the delusion of One World Government and is the major
flaw of the MIPOG idea.

Alejandro Pisanty

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy at malcolm.id.au>wrote:

> On 18 Mar 2014, at 5:58 pm, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang <
> wolfgang.kleinwaechter at MEDIENKOMM.UNI-HALLE.DE> wrote:
>
> > Mechanisms should emerge on the basis of concrete needs and identified
> gaps. The first thing you have to do is to define the issues which have no
> existing natural home. Many public policy related Internet issues have a
> natural home. There are about 50 governmental and non-governmental global
> organisations dealing with various Internet related issues: From UN bodies
> like the Human Rights Concil to the I*Organisations. To find out what the
> missing link is and where we have a gap (or a malfunction) we need first of
> all  something like a Multistakeholder Internet Governance Clearing House
> (I have called this MIPOG / Multistakeholder Internet Policy Group). If a
> stakeholder, including a national government, has a problem, it could go to
> MIPOG with a request and MIPOG would recommend how to move forward by
> delegating the request to an existing  mechanism or by launching a
> (multistakeholder) process in a bottom up, inclusive, open and transparent
> way to develop policies (as an RFC) which could, if needed, also include
> the launch of new multistakeholder mechanisms.
>
> That is also essentially what the submission posted through Best Bits
> calls for:
>
> http://bestbits.net/netmundial-roadmap/
>
> --
> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
> host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
>
> WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended
> to enable encryption at your end. For instructions, see
> http://jere.my/l/pgp.
>
>

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140318/3b55a4ef/attachment-0001.html>