[discuss] surveillance governance, was Re: [governance] NTIA statement

Sun Mar 23 09:30:15 UTC 2014

For purposes of discussion, it could make sense to focus on the phrase 'networked governance'  and see if that can work for this discussion track. 

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:02 PM, "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> 
> Rare agreement between Alejandro and I. ;-)
> I would use the term “networked governance” rather than “MS”, though
>  
> From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Pisanty
> 
> that is not the way the Internet's successful multistakeholder governance mechanisms have emerged - no need to ask for a higher, central, global authority for permission. In fact, the pieces of it that exist had to be circumvented in order to get the Internet to expand. The top-down authorization echoes the delusion of One World Government and is the major flaw of the MIPOG idea. 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140323/b345382a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss