[discuss] CircleID post: a way forward on what "Internet Governance" is, and is not

Mon Mar 31 08:18:19 UTC 2014

Dear Nathalie,

Thanks for your thoughts - I would propose one amendment though. Spam IS content - and dealing with spam in the various MS fora where it has been the focus of work for several years is a notable success in the security field (I will let those better versed in the field respond in more depth).

I would certainly say that robustness and net neutrality are 'transport platform' issues in the largest sense and therefore 'In scope' if you take my definition as a lens through which to view subjects.

On 29 Mar 2014, at 22:07, nathalie coupet <nathaliecoupet at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>  
> Applying Nick's definition, I believe the topics of spam, robustness of the Internet and network neutrality would fall under the categories covered by (non-Global) IG. Shouldn't we talk about that?
> 
> Could you please define the current situation with regards to these three subjects, the status of the work done in other fora (W3C for spam, perpass initiative update for robustness at the IETF,...). 
> 
> What other perspective could we bring to the discussions occurring elsewhere?    
> 
>   
> Nathalie
> 
> From: Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton at ccianet.org>
> To: "discuss at 1net.org List" <discuss at 1net.org> 
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:38 PM
> Subject: [discuss] CircleID post: a way forward on what "Internet	Governance" is, and is not
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> In case it is of interest, there's a CircleID post from me on why we need to have more clarity on what is, and is not, within the scope of "Internet Governance."  I propose a way to resolve the vagueness that has bedeviled this term for 10 years built around the concept that the data that is carried by the Internet and the network that carries that data are separate things, and that data should not be a part of "Internet Governance" because it is dealt with in many other venues.
> 
> I hope it is of interest. It is on the front page at the moment but the direct link is http://www.circleid.com/posts/20140328_internet_governance_what_does_it_mean_anyway/. 
> -- 
> Regards,
>  
> Nick Ashton-Hart
> Geneva Representative
> Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)
> Tel: +41 (22) 534 99 45
> Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44
> Mobile: +41 79 595 5468
> USA Tel: +1 (202) 640-5430
> email/IM (Jabber/GTalk): nashton at ccianet.org
> PGP: AB8CE773
> Fingerprint: 4B53 1B20 0CA0 5C83 2555 187C 0895 CEE9 AB8C E773
> Skype: nashtonhart 
> 
> http://www.ccianet.org
> 
> Need to schedule a meeting or call with me? Feel free to pick a time and date convenient for you at http://meetme.so/nashton
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140331/79aa0aeb/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140331/79aa0aeb/signature-0001.asc>