[discuss] Statement to present at World Internet Conference @ Wuzhen

Pindar Wong pindar.wong at gmail.com
Mon Nov 17 06:21:55 UTC 2014


It would be really good if you could also sign it Dave.

May I suggest then to change the text from

'to take the principles of NETmundial and to build upon them for the

Chinese Internet.'

to:

'to take the principles of NETmundial.br of April 2014
<http://netmundial.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/NETmundial-Multistakeholder-Document.pdf>
and to build upon them for the

Chinese Internet.'

This would avoid the 'confusingly similar' ;) NETmundial Initiative (NMI).

As far as the later, I believe the ISOC BoT had this so say yesterday:-

http://internetsociety.org/news/internet-society-statement-netmundial-initiative

p.





On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:29 AM, DAVID J. FARBER <farber at gmail.com> wrote:

> If you add the term original bazilian netmundir rather than the
> ambiguioius just netmundie, I would like to sign it. I want to
> distinguished from the current suggestions .
>
> On Nov 15, 2014 10:18 AM, "Christopher Wilkinson" <
> lists at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
>
>> James:
>>
>> You may add my name to the list of signatories:
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Christopher Wilkinson 秦基辅
>>
>>
>> On 14 Nov 2014, at 07:51, Pindar Wong <pindar.wong at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear James,
>>
>> Perhaps also consider that your recommendation be reworded as follows:-
>>
>> "Specifically, we would like to highlight the following recommendations
>> to:
>>
>> Preserve Internet as an innovation environment based on open and
>> distributed architecture;
>>
>> Develop the Internet as an unified and unfragmented space based on
>> end-to-end open Internet and adoption of IPv6;
>>
>> Promote open standards made by rough consensus of the global technical
>> community;
>>
>> Uphold the security, stability and resilience of the Internet through
>> strong cooperation among different stakeholders;'
>>
>> Also perhaps this friendly amendment:-
>>
>> 'Support the evolving Internet governance ecosystem by building upon
>> existing multi-stakeholder processes ensuring meaningful and accountable
>> *participation*.'
>>
>> m2c,
>>
>> p.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:43 PM, James Seng <james.seng at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, very good point. It should be Internet in China.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, November 13, 2014, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> With regards to para 3, I wonder whether making reference to the
>>>> “Internet in China” instead of the “Chinese Internet” would make the global
>>>> approach of the statement more clear.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  *From:* James Seng
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 12, 2014 5:43 AM
>>>> *To:* At-Large Worldwide ; mailto:discuss at 1net.org
>>>> *Subject:* [discuss] Statement to present at World Internet Conference
>>>> @ Wuzhen
>>>>
>>>>   Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> A couple of us have prepared a statement (as attached) to present at
>>>> the World Internet Conference @ Wuzhen next week.
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions to the statements are welcome.
>>>>
>>>> If you are willing to add your name to the statement, please drop me an
>>>> email.
>>>>
>>>> -James Seng
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> discuss mailing list
>>>> discuss at 1net.org
>>>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -James Seng
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at 1net.org
>>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20141117/c30276f6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list