[discuss] ITU - Internet related Resolutions

Mon Oct 27 13:50:57 UTC 2014

I ask myself the same question: how different for Governments is  the ITU forum from other Fora where they seems perfectly happy with the bottom up MS model?

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8335 2487
Enviado desde mi iPhone

> El 27/10/2014, a las 7:33, Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn at gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> I am curious to know why Brazil is on the side of Russia, despite embracing the multi-stakeholder model, demonstrated recently by Dilma Roussef's support for NetMundial and despite the proven success of nic.br's multi-stakeholder model, despite the benevolent influence of Brazilian Community Leaders like Harmut Glaser. What caused Brazil to be part of IBSA and why is it on the wrong side?
> 
> 
> Sivasubramanian M
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
>> > On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Adam <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
>> > Is Saudi speaking for a large block of countries?
>> 
>> In so far as lines are drawn, here’s what I’ve observed this evening:
>> 
>> On one side:
>> The Internets
>> United Kingdom
>> Bulgaria
>> Japan
>> Canada
>> USA
>> Australia
>> Ghana
>> Nigeria
>> New Zealand
>> Grenada
>> 
>> On the other side:
>> Saudi Arabia
>> Argentina
>> Brazil
>> Paraguay
>> Oman
>> Russia
>> 
>> Wildcard:
>> India
>> 
>> Helpful grammar authoritarians, who are striving to make evil documents at least marginally intelligible:
>> Bulgaria
>> Sweden
>> 
>> Meeting concluded with an admonishment by the chair to Saudi Arabia to consider limiting its contributions to ones which “reflect present reality.”
>> 
>> The Internet-issues ad-hoc reconvenes at 18:00 on Wednesday, unless the secretariat is able to find an earlier time.
>> 
>> Fact-checking the idiocy that’s spouted in this room is surprisingly difficult, given 85% packet loss getting out of the building.  One could be cynical about that, but I’ll resist the urge.
>> 
>>                                 -Bill
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20141027/706b86cf/attachment-0001.html>