<p dir="ltr">I think that question goes either way; what has using multiple emails by one person produced so far? Except that I have perhaps referring to a non existing name. - you know those feelings that comes when you call someone by name and then you suddenly realised that wasn't it's name afterall.<br>
For me I am not against using multiple email, but I am against using multiple identities by one person.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers!</p>
<p dir="ltr">sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 6 May 2014 02:50, "Michel Gauthier" <<a href="mailto:mg@telepresse.com">mg@telepresse.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
At 22:12 05/05/2014, Brian E Carpenter wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Indeed. And one-person one-name seems to be a vital rule to avoid falsifying the debate.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Dont you think that confusing /2NET with a debate is precisely what falsifies the MS process? Could you please indicate who is then the ICANN, ISOC, IAB, IETF, W3C, ITU, IEEE, RIR one person who shoualong you participate to the MS process concerning the IANA transition?<br>
<br>
My understanding of this list now is that there are people who want to work and build a real project with its real stakeholders and those who only want to chat with other chatters.<br>
<br>
Question is: what has the one-person one-mail-name module produced so far irt. the internet use satisfaction? I am just asking. I try to figure out what MSism is and what non<br>
<br>
M G <br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org" target="_blank">discuss@1net.org</a><br>
<a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">http://1net-mail.1net.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div>