[discuss] /1net Steering/Coordination Commitee
kdrstoll at gmail.com
Fri Dec 20 08:42:53 UTC 2013
On 12/20/2013 12:27 AM, michael gurstein wrote:
> Adiel and all,
> I don't know what process you went through to do this selection but
> you should be aware that the process undertaken by "Civil Society" in
> the selection of their nominees was so flawed as to render any
> nomination from the "Civil Society" grouping as illegitimate.
> The CS "Nominating Committee" was self-selected within the extremely
> limited set of civil society organizations currently active in the
> Internet Governance space (many of which have little or no actual
> membership or visible networking into the broader global Civil Society
> In the process of constituting their "Nominating Committee" there was
> no attempt to reach out to additional organizations with interests or
> activities in the broad IG area but which were not directly active in
> the very limited existing CS IG spaces. Where groupings such as the
> Community Informatics network*, of which I am a part indicated an
> interest in participation in the Nominating Committee and or of being
> nominated we were rebuffed without appropriate explanation, appeal or
> an indication that due transparent and accountable processes had been
> It is notable that all of the nominees from this self-selected
> nominating group are senior actors in the groups which
> self-constituted themselves as the nominating group and no others--a
> process of self-dealing, startling in its audacity if nothing else.
> As I've mentioned before on this list and to the Civil Society
> grouping, the Community Informatics community consists of a large
> number of practitioners, academics, researchers, and technical and
> policy activists, concerned with community based and grassroots users
> and NON-Users of the Internet including marginalized communities in
> Developed and Developing Countries, indigenous peoples, older persons,
> those with disabilities among others and thus look to provide an
> opportunity for "voice" for a very very significant constituency of
> those who are either under-represented or not represented at all in
> current IG discussions.
> I would strongly suggest that you reconsider your decision in this
> matter, go back to the "CS" "nominating committee" and insist that
> they conduct an appropriate, transparent, and accountable process
> inclusive of ALL those in Civil Society with an active interest and
> "stake" in Internet Governance matters.
> In the absence of this, unfortunately your process itself will be
> equally contaminated as was the "CS" process and the outcome of your
> activities will be equally unrepresentative of those globally who are
> impacted by and thus "stakeholders" in the Internet.
> *The Community Informatics community--thelarger Community Informatics
> community <http://vancouvercommunity.net/lists/info/ciresearchers>
> (consisting of both the general email list and specialized lists for
> Canada <http://vancouvercommunity.net/lists/info/cracin-canada>,
> Southern Africa
> <http://vancouvercommunity.net/lists/info/ci-research-sa>, Older
> <http://vancouvercommunity.net/lists/info/ci-for-older-persons> and
> Indigenous peoples <mailto:ci-indigenous at lists.knet.ca> as well as the
> Editorial Board of the Journal of Community Informatics
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On
> Behalf Of Adiel Akplogan
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:32 PM
> To: discuss at 1net.org
> Subject: [discuss] /1net Steering/Coordination Commitee
> Dear colleagues,
> At the end of the deadline for receiving names for the
> Coordination/Steering committee (many wrote to tell me that they
> prefer it to be a coordination committee instead of a steering one -
> Personally I don't mind as the most important for me is to have a
> multi-interest/stakeholder group that will help us in shaping the
> discussions and the campaign along with creating a sustainable bridge
> with every parties and interest group).
> The following names were submitted:
> ** from Business:
> 1. Aparna Sridhar, Telecom Policy Counsel, Google 2. David Fares,
> Senior Vice President, Government Relations, 21st Century Fox 3.
> Marilyn Cade, President, ICT Strategies mCade 4. Sarah Wynn-Williams,
> Manager, Global Public Policy, Facebook 5. Paul Mitchell, Senior
> Director, Technology Policy, Microsoft Corporation
> *** from Civil Society:
> 1. Joana Varon
> 2. Rafik Dammak
> 3. Anriette Esterhuysen
> 4. Vladimir Radunovik
> 5. Anja Kovacs
> The Technical community have requested additional time to complete
> their selection mechanism and I'm expecting to hear from Academic
> community anytime.
> In order to keep thing moving and start giving some structure to this
> initiative, I would like to suggest that we setup the coordination
> committee with the names we have while waiting for other to join.
> Hopefully very soon.
> As for the nominations related to Brazil meeting's committees, nothing
> has really progressed from the local committee side. We have names
> from Business constancy that will be forward to them. We will forward
> the other as I receive them. I have shared with you on this list all
> the information I have on that. Any further authoritative information
> regarding this and the way forward should be coming from CGI.BR.
> - a.
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss