[discuss] Representative Multistakeholderism (was: Re: Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013)

Tue Dec 24 18:30:21 UTC 2013

On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com>wrote:

> Mawaki,
>
> there will be great difficulty as people try to define stakeholder groups
> for more general and comprehensive approaches to Internet governance,
> instead of the sharper definitions that are viable for narrower definitions
> of the Internet governance problems one may try to solve.
>
>
Alejandro,

Thank you for your detailed reply. I suspected the complexity, but now it
looms even greater and more certain, and one has to wonder where to even
begin. I'll ponder this a little further and see whether I can even garner
the energy to map out the conceptual field (stemming from practice) and its
implications.

On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:35 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

> On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there an up-to-date reference document you could point to regarding
> the "open multistakeholder" model or any other similar model?
>
> I do not know of any; I am aware of the use of the phrase in reference to
> models of participation
> which are open to anyone (e.g. this mailing list, an IETF working group,
> the various RIR address
> policy development processes)
>

Thank you, John for your answer and for sharing your experience.

I wish you all a merry year-end.
Mawaki

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
*Mawaki Chango, PhD*
*Founder & Principal, DIGILEXIS Consulting*
http://www.digilexis.com
m.chango at digilexis.com
twitter.com/digilexis
twitter.com/dig_mawaki
Skype: digilexis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131224/f3ce1a42/attachment.html>