[discuss] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

[Jorge Amodio]

> On Dec 24, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Roland Perry <roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote:
> 
> In message <3F3260E0-6F18-4545-94DD-BAC10DD03F25 at gmail.com>, at 08:11:52 on Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com> writes
>> 
>> That proposal and subsequent meetings have been based on a long list of flawed assumptions, like that developing countries will not get their fare share of allocation of IPv6 address space and that allocation and assignment policies of IPv4 will be replicated for IPv6.
> 
> Many people would agree with you, but it's necessary to turn up and say that.
> 
>> And following ITU openness many if not all the documents related to that WG require TIES access.
> 
> A surprisingly large number don't.

Do you have a direct URL to them ? Last time I checked (yesterday) many including working drafts were behind TIES access. Take in account that I'm referring to the specific documents of this working group and not to general to ITU-T recommendations.

-J