[discuss] IPv6 Deployment and IG
nathaliecoupet at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 26 14:59:28 UTC 2013
This document might be of interest and provide further explanation on the issue being discussed.
ITU-T Proposal regarding IPv6 Address
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey at jefsey.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran at arin.net>
Cc: "discuss at 1net.org" <discuss at 1net.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [discuss] IPv6 Deployment and IG
At 14:16 26/12/2013, John Curran wrote:
>On Dec 25, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Brian E Carpenter
><brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 25/12/2013 20:17, John Curran wrote:
>However, to the best of my knowledge,
>the terminology therein is unknown to those marketing Internet services
>today (or by those supervising marketing of Internet services to the public.)
>It's excellent example where the IETF has quite a bit of effort with the
>goal of a better Internet,
OpenStand has explained that a better internet is an internet better
driven by the economics of global markets fueled by technological
advancements. This is a liberal technology approach based on MSism.
As a result, IPv6, DNSSEC, etc. sound like unacceptable dirigisms.
Your discussion shows that there are many politically influenced
visions of the technology, and terminology based misunderstandings.
Who is to take care of this, if not a business (this is going to have
a cost) motivated IG?
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss