[discuss] IPv6 Deployment and IG

[parminder]

If it is the global IG and its possible reform that we are focussed on, 
I see three distinct areas in which we will need to take up discussion 
and possible reform

1. Technical coordination of the Internet

2. Bridge/ Interface issues (between 1 and 3)

3. Global Internet related public policy making

Going into basic definitions of governance etc IMHO may be of limited 
use here. We may instead clarify the above terms and spaces and see who 
does what, what are the deficiencies and what is needed to be changed.. 
It will also be hugely productive to conduct the discussions separately 
on these three lines.

parminder



On Saturday 28 December 2013 07:07 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
>
>
>     Governance is social steering.  Governance is not government.
>      Governance is not necessarily top down.  Governance takes many
>     forms and is arrived at through many paths, collective
>     action---e.g. coordination and collaboration---being one of them.
>      etc etc etc.
>
>
> That is not the interpretation on the Spanish speaking part of the world
>
> And it is not just social steering, corporate governance in many cases 
> turn not to be very social :-)
>
> I really like the definition in Wikipedia 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance, that if used on Internet 
> Governance translates into the act of Governing the Internet...
>
> Now we can talk about governance of different entities such as ICANN, 
> ISOC, etc, but that is more in line with corporate governance than the 
> overall Internet Governance idea, and that many (surprisingly some of 
> them call themselves experts) point to ICANN as the Mecca of Internet 
> Governance.
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131228/8c9c3c4f/attachment.html>