[discuss] ICANN proposal for NTIA transition published
jefsey at jefsey.com
Wed Apr 9 14:42:42 UTC 2014
27 meetings to go. Probably thousands of pages to read. I am a simple
master of his own VGN who wants as billions to optimize his Internet
use and protection. What is in all this for me?
I now use a simple metric before wasting time on a document: I run a
find on "use" in it (if any) which corresponds to standalone Internet
use, or user.
* I found only one remote allusion in the ICANN page: they want to
coordinate with special use registries.
* In the scope, I found none.
1. So I am not concerned. Good.
2. Can I be affected? It seems not as ICANN adopt a two reasonable
two steps process adapted the Sao Paulo leak.
2.1. to adapt itself.
2.2. to adapt its IANA service to the then prevailing circumstances.
In the scope it provides a nice illustration which evidences that:
2.2.1. there are four functions with a development accountable
organization (DAO). Two are of general purpose, two are of Class IN interest.
2.2.2. the content of these functions is generically called the
"IANA" for which ICANN provides a centralized repository and
As a standalone VGN operator I am only interested in a consistent
updated content of all the technology and networking parameters I
use, i.e. a metadata distrubuted registry protocol (MDRP) this four
Internet DAOs, and all the non-internet layers ones will use.
I therefore understand that the ball is in the IAB field: a consensus
would be welcome on
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iab-iana-framework-02.txt within a
conxtext where there is no selected groups with different equal
footing layers, and a regular appeal procedure.
At 03:38 09/04/2014, Jordan Carter wrote:
>ICANN has released its proposal for the transition dialogue re NTIA
>The page and material is at
>This page includes the principles and mechanisms and seeks comment
>on these, as well as a process that involves an ICANN community
>steering group with an ICANN secretariat to help the discussion
>along. Scope is set out in a paper linked from this page at
>On a very cursory and initial read, the scope appears to not account
>properly for the broad oversight or stewardship functions of the
>NTIA in respect of the DNS, and rules out discussion of IANA being
>operated by ICANN as part of the conversation.
>04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
><mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>jordan at internetnz.net.nz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss