[discuss] [IANAtransition] Troll
Shatan, Gregory S.
GShatan at ReedSmith.com
Thu Apr 17 02:40:55 UTC 2014
The entire selection from the Angeles book was clearly a quote, including the portion you excerpted below, which in turn was used (along with other quoted material) solely to demonstrate the variable and contradictory use of "ad hominem."
-----Original Message-----
From: Michel Gauthier [mailto:mg at telepresse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 9:55 PM
To: Shatan, Gregory S.; Jay Daley; ianatransition at icann.org; discuss at 1net.org List
Subject: RE: [IANAtransition] Troll
At 03:17 17/04/2014, Shatan, Gregory S. wrote:
>I will close my participation in this thread by noting that Godwin's Law is:
>
>Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies [a.k.a the Sexton-Godwin Law]:
>As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison
>involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.
>>>Contrast the following:
>>>
>>>A. From Peter A. Angeles, Dictionary of Philosophy-- published by
>>>Barnes and Noble, copyright 1981.
>>>
>>>3. Fallacy of argumentum ad hominem (argument against the man) .
>>>The Latin means "argument to the man." (a) Arguing against, or
>>>rejecting a person's views by attacking or abusing his personality,
>>>character, motives, intentions, qualifications, etc.
>>>as opposed to providing evidence why the views are incorrect.
>>>Example: "What John said should not be believed because he was a Nazi
>>>sympathizer."
I did not follow on this in spite of being on the thread because I prefered to believe "John" was a typo.
M G
* * *
This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered
confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in
error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply
e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or
use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other
person. Thank you for your cooperation.
* * *
To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we
inform you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax
advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state
and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00
More information about the discuss
mailing list