[discuss] [governance] [ciresearchers] NETmundial documentsonline for comment

Sat Apr 19 23:49:31 UTC 2014

+1 and I couldn’t agree more since the function here is to increasing corporate and developed country dominance in and through the Internet and MSism is the perfect form for achieving this.

http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2014/03/26/the-multistakeholder-model-neo-liberalism-and-global-internet-governance/

http://tinyurl.com/ogmvkgr

M

From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf Of Shatan, Gregory S.
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 12:19 AM
To: 'Alejandro Pisanty'; Avri Doria
Cc: discuss at 1net.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] [governance] [ciresearchers] NETmundial documentsonline for comment

Agree with Avri (and Alejandro) on this point.

From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Pisanty
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 10:53 AM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: discuss at 1net.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] [governance] [ciresearchers] NETmundial documentsonline for comment

+1

Let form follow function.

Alejandro Pisanty

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> *From:*Ian Peter [mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com]

> I agree with your point Michael. I am travelling now, but I think you
> should make the point in NetMundial document somehow that extending
> multistakeholderism to all aspects on governance “on the internet” could
> be problematic and does not have universal agreement.
>
>

Of course no point of view has universal agreement, no matter how small
or large the group.

I beleive that some form of multistakeholderism is appropriate for any
Internet governance issue.  I argue that a uni-stakeholder system is
_never_ appropriate for the Internet. Or anywhere else for that matter.

Though I would agree that extending any one system to the Internet is
going to be problematic.  What is most problematic is the view that
multistakeholderism only consists of one model, or that any form of the
model is the solution to all issues.  Each issue has an appropriate form
of the multistakeholder model, different sets of actors, roles and
responsibilities.  The difficulty is coming to consensus on the proper mix.

Just wanted to make sure we knew that we did not have universal
agreement on your statement.  I may be alone, but I think that
multistakeholderism, in its variety of expressions and modalities of
participatory democracy, is the only way forward possible.  Anything
else leaves some relevant actors outside the solution and is
fundamentally anti-democratic.

avri

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . 

* * *

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your cooperation.

* * *

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140420/db54bdf5/attachment-0001.html>