[discuss] [bestbits] FINAL VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT - FOR PRINTING

Sat Apr 26 19:49:41 UTC 2014

I agree with Marilyn.  The phrase "enhanced cooperation" has many different meanings and is being used to promote various agendas. A sentence linking EC to a multistakeholder process is helpful and limits efforts to promote enhanced cooperation through government-led groups.

I am impressed with how well the Multistakeholder experiment in Sao Paulo worked--and how well remote participants like me could follow and engage in what happened there.

Mike Nelson

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Marilyn Cade<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>
Sent: ‎4/‎26/‎2014 3:28 PM
To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight<mailto:michele at blacknight.com>
Cc: internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org<mailto:internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org>; discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [bestbits] FINAL VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT - FOR PRINTING

I can comment why the para on EC is both useful and needed,in my personal view. Others will chime in, undoubtedly.

There are different views on whether it has started, what examples exist, whether it only states or also other stakeholders who engage
In EC.

There is a MS working group that is doing an analysis. Some on these lists are part of the WG, or following .

Facts are our friend, regardless of which view is held. The work of the analysis and identifying Gaps, and then how to address them is ongoing.

The statement calls for advancing the continued discussion in a multistakeholder fashion.

NETMundial was a really amazing experience of "practicing
MS " around a particular set of work items. The Brazilian hosts deserve great appreciation for their organization!

I think the opportunity ahead is how to further examine what the "statement of Sao Paolo" says and how to continue work, especially at
IGF,  but not only there.

I know many were in Sao Paolo and many followed remotely.

Welcome further discussion.

M
Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 25, 2014, at 17:15, "Michele Neylon - Blacknight" <michele at blacknight.com<mailto:michele at blacknight.com>> wrote:

Greg

That’s helpful – and I’ve a nice long flight tomorrow to catch up on this and so many other things :)

Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Domains
http://www.blacknight.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://www.technology.ie
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org<mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org> [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf Of Shatan, Gregory S.
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 4:30 AM
To: 'Peter Dengate Thrush'; discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
Cc: internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org<mailto:internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [bestbits] FINAL VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT - FOR PRINTING

All:

I have prepared a comparison of the final NETmundial document to the April 14 draft (Word document as posted to the NETmundial website).  I thought this might be helpful to all.

Enjoy….

Greg Shatan

From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org<mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org> [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf Of Peter Dengate Thrush
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:40 PM
To: discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
Cc: internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org<mailto:internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [bestbits] FINAL VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT - FOR PRINTING

Yes - thanks for a prompt circulation.

On a quick read, the Principles seem unobjectionable, with sufficient motherhood and apple pie for most to find something they can support in them.

On the Roadmap, this portion could be a worry:

"Enhanced cooperation as referred to in the Tunis Agenda to address international public policy issues pertaining to the Internet must be implemented on a priority and consensual basis. Taking into consideration the efforts of the CSTD working group on enhanced cooperation, it is important that all stakeholders commit to advancing this discussion in a multistakeholder fashion."

There remains significant disagreement about what "enhanced cooperation" in that context actually means.
While it might have been better to move on from that concept, at least this recommends only "advancing the discussion", and that it be done in a "multistakeholder fashion".

Also good to see plenty of support for the IGF.

regards

Peter

On 25/04/2014, at 11:45 am, Shatan, Gregory S. <GShatan at ReedSmith.com<mailto:GShatan at ReedSmith.com>> wrote:

Thanks!

Greg Shatan

From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org<mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org> [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf Of Jordan Carter
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 7:27 PM
To: discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>; internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org<mailto:internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org>
Subject: [discuss] Fwd: [bestbits] FINAL VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT - FOR PRINTING

Dear all

NetMundial final docs attached fyi

Jordan

Jordan Carter

Wellington, New Zealand
+64 21 442 649

Sent on the run, apologies for brevity

Begin forwarded message:
From: Carolina Rossini <carolina.rossini at gmail.com<mailto:carolina.rossini at gmail.com>>
Date: 24 April 2014 8:08:00 pm GMT-3
To: "<bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>>" <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>>, governance at lists.igcaucus.org<mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
Subject: [bestbits] FINAL VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT - FOR PRINTING
Reply-To: Carolina Rossini <carolina.rossini at gmail.com<mailto:carolina.rossini at gmail.com>>

* * *

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your cooperation.

* * *

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140426/ed5fee0b/attachment-0001.html>