[discuss]  The future of 1net
mg at telepresse.com
Mon Apr 28 16:13:42 UTC 2014
At 15:19 28/04/2014, joseph alhadeff wrote:
>What seems to be clear is that there is only room for one vision and
>one topic. Not sure that this is a beneficial shared objective or
>functional operational method for this list, but then I only speak
>for myself. Let's see how others on the list feel.
I am a little lost among vision, themes, and topics. I would like to
be sure I understand what you suggest:
1. one vision: as defined in the NETmundial document?
2. one topic: IANA functions transfer?
3. every theme accepted, i.e. every possible perspective (i.e. ICANN;
no ICANN, Verisign, GAC being completed by other stakeholders
committies (ex. consumers, academics, etc.; crossed with
transparency, accountability, etc.) as per a grid proposed by George?
4. from one stakeholder group perspective at a time (Govs, business,
academics, techies, users, lawyers, others)
Is that you intend?
More information about the discuss