[discuss] Possible approaches to solving "problem no. 1"
mg at telepresse.com
Mon Feb 10 22:28:59 UTC 2014
At 19:27 10/02/2014, Dr. Ben Fuller wrote:
>How do we structure the multi stakeholder component? To paraphrase a
>bit, questions such as; Who is a stakeholder? How are they defined?
>What rights do they have? How are new stakeholders accepted? How are
>their voices heard? How are they internally organised? These are all
>questions to take forward.
I like the joke!
>Finally, you point out that ICANN is a "well defined and specific
>instantiation of the multistakeholder model."
This is absolutely true...
>This is correct when one looks at the ICANN schedule of meetings. My
>experience of ICANN meetings is that some regular attendees come
>because the meetings afford the space to deal with Internet issues
>that are not directly related to the root. It might be useful to
>appreciate this wider, informal function of ICANN.
(Some call them the "web set party tour")
More information about the discuss