[discuss] Attached: Possible approaches to solving "problem no. 1"
jcurran at istaff.org
Mon Feb 17 17:58:49 UTC 2014
On Feb 17, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Dominique Lacroix <dl at panamo.eu> wrote:
> Sorry. The attached image. @+, Dom
The statement that "The government may take ownership of deliverables
in exchange for the consideration provided under this contract " does
not support the assertion that it is the "USG position is that the root
is an US property."
If the USG indicated that it was taking ownership of the root zone per
the contract, then there may be a basis to make some claim of a USG
position, but as is, it's simply an option, not a position statement.
Disclaimer: My views alone.
More information about the discuss