[discuss] DNS resolution (was: discuss Digest, Vol 3, Issue 67)
sm+1net at elandsys.com
Fri Feb 21 06:29:18 UTC 2014
At 11:14 20-02-2014, Barry Shein wrote:
>David is correct.
>Many hosts work this way, many, many do not.
>Try the same experiment with www.complaint.com (18.104.22.168).
>It's even more complicated than that (e.g., references embedded within
There have been complaints on this mailing list about some
discussions being too technical. I will skip the technical details.
The issue was whether a web site which was subject to domain name
seizure can still be accessed by the user. My conclusion was yes. I
took into consideration the publicly available information  about
the impact of these domain seizures to reach that conclusion.
1. I doubt that anyone from the .SE ccTLD would disagree
More information about the discuss