[discuss] governments and rule of law (was: Possible approaches to solving...)
apisanty at gmail.com
Thu Feb 27 06:34:15 UTC 2014
thanks. That seems to be a Board which also finds itself occasionally in
controversy about its actions, in particular whether it complies with
policy and strictly limits itself to its prescribed role:
As I said, not exclusive to ICANN.
Next issue please...
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:32 PM, John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com>
> > John,
> > I'll let others closer to the present Board reply about the situation as
> is at present. I'm sure your advice would be welcome as input for many of
> the processes ICANN has undertaken. In what I have seen of the board "all
> of the above" would be my answer if you asked "what have you bumped into
> and how have you solved it?"
> > What would make your contribution even more interesting and useful would
> be examples from other Internet-resource policy coordination organizations.
> I'm sure you have a treasure chest of those!
> I'll can supply at least one: <https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html>
> (Part I, Section IV defines principles for sound Internet address policy,
> i.e. that
> which the community should be striving for during policy development and
> for good policy)
> (Part I, Section V, defines ARIN Board criteria for policy changes, i.e
> that which
> must be specifically evaluated during the policy ratification process.)
> Disclaimer: My views alone.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss