[discuss] role of 1-Net in organization

[Nick Ashton-Hart]

Joe,

Perhaps you might specify what nearer term objectives you have in mind in your last paragraph?

Regards, Nick

Joe Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
>Jorge:
>
> 
>
>The wait has been a combination of frustrating and never-ending.  We
>seem to be making progress, but halving our distance to the objective
>each time, with no prospect of actually getting there.  In the interim,
>time marches on and the meeting date looms ever closer.  
>
>  
>
>The problem is that there have been posts by some on this list
>indicating that some stakeholders do not see 1Net as that vehicle.  I
>would not argue with that conclusion if it was a group consensus or
>even a group impasse, but for those of us who are trying to decide how
>best to coordinate our work, we need to know whether there is possible
>consensus on the role of 1Net, if not, then it's an interesting
>discussion group, but we work our coordination efforts through other
>channels.  Stakeholder buy in cannot be demonstrated solely from within
>an executive committee who have presumably provided buy in from their
>participation.
>
> 
>
>CGI already plays a local role in coordination which is why I thought
>their views on the possible role of 1-Net would also be informative. 
>Similarly, any clarity or insight on the possible role of 1-Net as
>perceived by the Brazilian government would also be of interest. While
>this list has take a life of its own, it was generated by some
>discussions engaged in during the IGF in Baku at the instigation of
>ICANN and some of the I*s, any thoughts from those perspectives would
>also be welcome.
>
> 
>
>While I understand the interest in the breadth of topics on this list,
>there are some nearer-term objectives which have be dealt with in a
>more expedited timeframe and I just wanted to pose the question in a
>separate discussion thread of whether this list has a role to play, and
>if so what is it? 
>
> 
>
>Best-
>
> 
>
>Joe
>
> 
>
>From: Jorge Amodio [mailto:jmamodio at gmail.com] 
>Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 7:57 AM
>To: Joe Alhadeff
>Cc: Adiel Akplogan; discuss at 1net.org
>Subject: Re: [discuss] role of 1-Net in organization
>
> 
>
> 
>
>I guess we need to wait for the Executive Multistakeholder Committee to
>form and get organized.
>
> 
>
>According to Carlos:
>
>
>"The EMC will be responsible for organizing the event, including the
>discussion and implementation of the agenda, and the selection of the
>participants and the various stakeholders' proposals. The crucial part
>of the preparation process resides here, in close coordination with the
>Logistics Committee, so people selected for the EMC ought to make
>themselves readily available for this challenge."
>
> 
>
>Regards
>
>Jorge
>
> 
>
>On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Joe Alhadeff <HYPERLINK
>"mailto:joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com" \njoseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
>wrote:
>
>Colleagues:
>
>Taking a cue from bullet 2... As a separate thread, I was hoping we
>could discuss what role 1-Net might play in helping to organize the
>Brazil meeting as a separate thread.  This is meant to be a dialog on
>the possible role, not how to populate committees or organize
>stakeholders.  The participation of colleagues from CGI would be very
>useful in this discussion as well.
>
>Joe
>
> 
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>discuss mailing list
>discuss at 1net.org
>http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140105/98c45b92/attachment.html>