[discuss] limitation of mails per day?

[Bertrand de La Chapelle]

Adiel +1

supporting also the suggestion from bill manning, that you included in your
point 3.: It would be very useful if you could, as coordinators, make a
brief recap list of the main themes that have been addressed (just the
themes, not necessarily a summary of the comments) to prepare for more
focused threads.

Highlighting the ones that have triggered the most reactions would also be
useful.

Best

B.


 "*Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes*", Antoine de
Saint Exupéry
("*There is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans*") BERTRAND
DE LA CHAPELLEInternet & Jurisdiction Project | Director email
bdelachapelle at internetjurisdiction.net email bdelachapelle at gmail.com
twitter @IJurisdiction <https://twitter.com/IJurisdiction> |
@bdelachapelle<https://twitter.com/bdelachapelle>
mobile +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32www.internetjurisdiction.net [image: A GLOBAL
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE PROCESS]


On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Adiel Akplogan <adiel at afrinic.net> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> To prevent this thread to become one of the things we want to avoid, I
> would like to conclude the discussion saying that that idea of limitation
> does not fly and there has been interesting valid arguments showing that
> the side effect of such limitation to posts may be more detrimental to the
> discussions, the substance and /1net spirit globally.
>
> So can I offer these few suggestions going forward:
>
> 1. We all use our good judgment to be concise and direct/precise as much
> as possible on topics we are contributing to.
> 2. We all make effort to create new subjects line when a topic starts
> drifting to something irrelevant to the original subject of a thread.
> 3. We will try to organise ourselves to provide some regular stats and
> summary of the discussions, highlighting key topics to allow some further
> focus discussion where needed.
>
> Globally I think we are seeing some interesting and substantial multi
> perspective discussions on the list. Let keep the spirit while evolving to
> a process that will provide more concrete outputs.
>
> Let move on and close this topic for now.
>
> Thank you all for you inputs.
>
> - a.
>
> On 2014-01-03, at 13:16 PM, Adiel Akplogan <adiel at afrinic.net> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > In one of the thread there was a suggestion to limit the number of mails
> per day per person to make it easy for everyone to follow and prevent few
> and same people to overload the mailing list (the number of 4 was suggested
> but that is disputable). I know some will jump that it is will be breach to
> freedom of expression :-) (which in fact will be somehow true), but frankly
> it is becoming not easy to keep track of everything posted on the list. (I
> have to catchup with 300+ emails after few days off) Can_we/should_we do
> anything at all about that? Thoughts?
> >
> > - a.
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at 1net.org
> > http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140105/74403f2f/attachment.html>