[discuss] ICANN policy and "Internet Governance"
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Sun Jan 5 22:36:36 UTC 2014
From: Michel Gauthier [mailto:mg at telepresse.com]
>This is something that many have many times explained; "global" means for most
>"US global control". This is exactly what the world learned recently to distrust.
To me, global means not "inter-national," not "unilateral," but non-national - excluding also the US, which is after all just another nation-state.
So when the Montevideo statement calls for globalization of the IANA function it was calling for precisely the opposite of "US global control."
> keeping using the word "global Internet governance" is a (certainly proud, but
>unambiguous) signal that the Sao Paulo target is to affirm the US leadership on the Internet.
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Do you really think the Brazilians are interested in affirming US leadership?
>Is this something that the member of this list confirm?
> This would confirm the purpose of this list as many analysts understand it.
I would not only not confirm it, I would emphatically deny it.
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
More information about the discuss