[discuss] limitation of mails per day?

[Bertrand de La Chapelle]

Yes Joe,

I spotted it afterwards :-) Like for a few others apparently, some of the
messages from this discuss list had gotten caught into my Gmail spam
folder. Pablo's mail was unfortunately one of them.

Great work by Pablo, by the way. Good example of distributed
self-organization on this list.

B.



 "*Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes*", Antoine de
Saint Exupéry
("*There is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans*") BERTRAND
DE LA CHAPELLEInternet & Jurisdiction Project | Director email
bdelachapelle at internetjurisdiction.net email bdelachapelle at gmail.com
twitter @IJurisdiction <https://twitter.com/IJurisdiction> |
@bdelachapelle<https://twitter.com/bdelachapelle>
mobile +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32www.internetjurisdiction.net [image: A GLOBAL
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE PROCESS]


On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Joseph Alhadeff
<joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>wrote:

> Pablo has done this for us in his recap.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 5, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Bertrand de La Chapelle <
> bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Adiel +1
>
> supporting also the suggestion from bill manning, that you included in
> your point 3.: It would be very useful if you could, as coordinators, make
> a brief recap list of the main themes that have been addressed (just the
> themes, not necessarily a summary of the comments) to prepare for more
> focused threads.
>
> Highlighting the ones that have triggered the most reactions would also be
> useful.
>
> Best
>
> B.
>
>
>  "*Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes*", Antoine de
> Saint Exupéry
> ("*There is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans*") BERTRAND
> DE LA CHAPELLEInternet & Jurisdiction Project | Director email
> bdelachapelle at internetjurisdiction.net email bdelachapelle at gmail.com
> twitter @IJurisdiction <https://twitter.com/IJurisdiction> |
> @bdelachapelle <https://twitter.com/bdelachapelle> mobile +33 (0)6 11 88
> 33 32www.internetjurisdiction.net [image: A GLOBAL MULTI-STAKEHOLDER
> DIALOGUE PROCESS]
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Adiel Akplogan <adiel at afrinic.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> To prevent this thread to become one of the things we want to avoid, I
>> would like to conclude the discussion saying that that idea of limitation
>> does not fly and there has been interesting valid arguments showing that
>> the side effect of such limitation to posts may be more detrimental to the
>> discussions, the substance and /1net spirit globally.
>>
>> So can I offer these few suggestions going forward:
>>
>> 1. We all use our good judgment to be concise and direct/precise as much
>> as possible on topics we are contributing to.
>> 2. We all make effort to create new subjects line when a topic starts
>> drifting to something irrelevant to the original subject of a thread.
>> 3. We will try to organise ourselves to provide some regular stats and
>> summary of the discussions, highlighting key topics to allow some further
>> focus discussion where needed.
>>
>> Globally I think we are seeing some interesting and substantial multi
>> perspective discussions on the list. Let keep the spirit while evolving to
>> a process that will provide more concrete outputs.
>>
>> Let move on and close this topic for now.
>>
>> Thank you all for you inputs.
>>
>> - a.
>>
>> On 2014-01-03, at 13:16 PM, Adiel Akplogan <adiel at afrinic.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > In one of the thread there was a suggestion to limit the number of
>> mails per day per person to make it easy for everyone to follow and prevent
>> few and same people to overload the mailing list (the number of 4 was
>> suggested but that is disputable). I know some will jump that it is will be
>> breach to freedom of expression :-) (which in fact will be somehow true),
>> but frankly it is becoming not easy to keep track of everything posted on
>> the list. (I have to catchup with 300+ emails after few days off)
>> Can_we/should_we do anything at all about that? Thoughts?
>> >
>> > - a.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > discuss mailing list
>> > discuss at 1net.org
>> > http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140106/3e9a0780/attachment.html>