[discuss] Having several trust anchors for DNSSEC (was Re: cgi.br release...)

[Nick Ashton-Hart]

Isn't that more a subject for an ICANN meeting?

On 14 Jan 2014, at 12:17, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> S Moonesamy <sm+1net at elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
>> At 00:31 14-01-2014, parminder wrote:
>>> http://www.internetgovernance.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/SecuringTheRoot.pdf
>> 
>> Thanks for the references.
> [..]
>> The analysis might have to be updated as it 
>> was done prior to the Root zone being signed.
> 
> While the document is indeed old, what Brenden Kuerbis and Milton
> Mueller proposed there --having several trust anchors for DNSSEC--
> IMO still looks like a very good idea from today's perspective.
> 
> I propose to include this in the agenda for the São Paulo meeting.
> 
> Greetings,
> Norbert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140114/165501f2/signature.asc>