[discuss] Continuation of problem no. 1 specification, and what could be next steps

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Sat Jan 25 12:34:51 UTC 2014


On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:05:51AM -0600, Jorge Amodio wrote:

> access" in the sense that access to fiber routes ( in particular for
> international connections ) and peering arrangements are not today a
> level playing field.

Citations of cases, please.  I don't believe either of those claims is
true, except in the obvious sense that peering is voluntary and some
carriers are unwilling to peer with others if there's not a fair
trade.  (If the proposal is that more-connected carriers have to
subsidize development of infrastructure in less-connected regions in
order to increase fairness, I want to know why that is something the
carriers have to do.  That sounds like international aid to me.)



Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com

More information about the discuss mailing list