[discuss] Continuation of problem no. 1 specification, and what could be next steps

[Seun Ojedeji]

sent from Google nexus 4
On 25 Jan 2014 12:14, "Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro" <
salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Since we are only constrained by 4 posts per day, this response would be
my 4th so it will be my last one today. My response is below (inline):
>

I am not aware that such constraint has been implemented on this list,
perhaps because I have not exceeded 4 in a day recently. Will be good to
know if anyone has experienced this rule in action.

Cheers!
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Jan 25, 2014, at 8:19 PM, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Few Quick questions
> >
> > - what is the reason for citing RFC1918 ?
> (Sala) No special reason in particular :)
>
> > - what you intend to show with your "GAC penetration rate" and where
those percentages come from ?
>
> (Sala) See the sentence before that to show countries and territories who
participate. the numbers are from a count using information on the GAC
links on the ICANN website benchmarked to the countries and territories
that IANA has assigned ccTLDs to.
>
> > - what do you mean about "invest in ICANN" ?
> > (Sala) As in "invest" in the ordinary sense of the word.
>
> > There are many missing events in your timeline and DNS implementation
and control of the root zone started before 1991.
>
> > (Sala) Of course, a million things happened but for the purpose and
context of the issues concerned, I only selected what was relevant.
>
>
> > Regards
> > -Jorge
> >
> >> On Jan 25, 2014, at 12:43 AM, "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <
salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> > [snipped]
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140125/18cf2adc/attachment.html>