[discuss] Real world Impact of multiple roots
sm+1net at elandsys.com
Mon Jan 27 08:43:53 UTC 2014
At 22:55 26-01-2014, Ben fuller wrote:
>Does anyone out there know of studies on the
>economic impact that having two or more root
>zones. Ive been wondering what might happen to
>Namibia where we have mining, tourism,
> financial and fishing sectors all of which
> are very important to our economy if the
> country were to switch over to another Internet
> with another route. When I think about it I can
> only come up with very bad scenarios and it
> would be nice to see if I am missing something.
In the above (see quoted text), "another Internet
with another route" is mentioned. I am not sure what it means.
The .na ccTLD is currently DNSSEC-signed. The
other (DNS) root zone would require another trust
anchor. You and I would not be sharing a common
namespace and I would not be able to communicate as easily with you.
I don't recall seeing any studies about having
two or more root zones. The economic impact on
the mining, tourism and financial sectors would
depend on how important the existing system is to
those sectors. A few days ago there was a DNS
issue in a country . It may be possible to use that as a case study.
>Also, what are the mechanics of switching to
>another root? Im thinking of questions like;
>How do you program routers? Can undersea cables
>carry both types of traffic? Could BIND handle two roots? Etc.
It does not require any change to
routing. Undersea cables will carry that
traffic. It is not a matter of whether BIND can
handle two root zones. The relevant people will
have to reconfigure their DNS resolvers. It is
logistically difficult to get everyone nation-wide to do that.
More information about the discuss