[discuss] Net Neutrality: Perhaps the FCC is the wrong agency?
willi.uebelherr at gmail.com
Wed Jun 4 15:23:59 UTC 2014
i thank you very much for your answer with your very wide thinking. I
like it. On the end you wrote:
Am 04/06/2014 08:24, schrieb FSP4NET:
> In this aggregate of Masters' VGN and Lasters'VGN that makes the
> internet there is no core. It is purely distributed and meshed.
> There is therefore the need to address things through an
> architectonics referential system, i.e. a system which does not
> depend on people, but on the universe itself or at least to a
> sufficiently stable and large part of it, i.e. a purely algorithmic
> hazardous portion of it.
Maybe now i understand more, what you think. The free connection of free
people. As self organized masters in her self-defined communication.
Yes, this is my intention. And for that that i propose the geografical
defined IP address to make this very easy, because then we don't need
any Internet Gouvernance. We act together based on our common interest
for a free communication overall over the planet. A free communication
system for the free access to free knowledge for all people of our
many greetings, willi
Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa.
More information about the discuss