[discuss] Net Neutrality: Perhaps the FCC is the wrong agency?
willi uebelherr
willi.uebelherr at gmail.com
Wed Jun 4 15:23:59 UTC 2014
Dear JFC,
i thank you very much for your answer with your very wide thinking. I
like it. On the end you wrote:
Am 04/06/2014 08:24, schrieb FSP4NET:
> ...
> In this aggregate of Masters' VGN and Lasters'VGN that makes the
> internet there is no core. It is purely distributed and meshed.
> There is therefore the need to address things through an
> architectonics referential system, i.e. a system which does not
> depend on people, but on the universe itself or at least to a
> sufficiently stable and large part of it, i.e. a purely algorithmic
> hazardous portion of it.
Maybe now i understand more, what you think. The free connection of free
people. As self organized masters in her self-defined communication.
Yes, this is my intention. And for that that i propose the geografical
defined IP address to make this very easy, because then we don't need
any Internet Gouvernance. We act together based on our common interest
for a free communication overall over the planet. A free communication
system for the free access to free knowledge for all people of our
(free) world.
many greetings, willi
Jinotepe, Nicaragua
---
Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa.
http://www.avast.com
More information about the discuss
mailing list