[discuss] Net Neutrality: Perhaps the FCC is the wrong agency?

willi uebelherr willi.uebelherr at gmail.com
Wed Jun 4 15:23:59 UTC 2014

Dear JFC,

i thank you very much for your answer with your very wide thinking. I 
like it. On the end you wrote:

Am 04/06/2014 08:24, schrieb FSP4NET:
 > ...
 > In this aggregate of Masters' VGN and Lasters'VGN that makes the
 > internet there is no core. It is purely distributed and meshed.
 > There is therefore the need to address things through an
 > architectonics referential system, i.e. a system which does not
 > depend on people, but on the universe itself or at least to a
 > sufficiently stable and large part of it, i.e. a purely algorithmic
 > hazardous portion of it.

Maybe now i understand more, what you think. The free connection of free 
people. As self organized masters in her self-defined communication.

Yes, this is my intention. And for that that i propose the geografical 
defined IP address to make this very easy, because then we don't need 
any Internet Gouvernance. We act together based on our common interest 
for a free communication overall over the planet. A free communication 
system for the free access to free knowledge for all people of our 
(free) world.

many greetings, willi
Jinotepe, Nicaragua

Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa.

More information about the discuss mailing list