[discuss] Not Neutrality...

[FSP4NET]

At 07:05 24/06/2014, Barry Shein wrote:
>This author gets it right, he wins the internet.

Still two announced papers.

>He does miss one aspect, however, which is that the FCC is the chief
>content censor in the United States.

Architectonically this is the hardware/software/brainware nature of a 
business where competition replaced regulation on the condition of no 
cross-subzidisation. Brainware revenues had not been considered, so 
no one know if/how they can be regulated. FCC is therefore in need to 
decide on a case per case without a metric. This is barely 
acceptable, but no one has a solution yet.

>  There's a reason for that besides
>mere jurisdiction: Their regulations are subject to public hearings
>and pressure which makes them a target for groups with extremely
>narrow cultural agendas.

In brainware subjective issues have the focus. Open source was 
already a problem in software.

jfcm
fasp4net spoke person

>  Make someone king and someone will make a run
>for the castle.
>
>   http://www.wired.com/2014/06/net_neutrality_missing/
>
>or
>
>   http://tinyurl.com/m4486br
>
>
>--
>         -Barry Shein
>
>The World              | bzs at TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
>Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
>Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*
>
>_______________________________________________
>discuss mailing list
>discuss at 1net.org
>http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss