[discuss] Not Neutrality...
alliance at fsp4.net
Tue Jun 24 11:08:55 UTC 2014
At 07:05 24/06/2014, Barry Shein wrote:
>This author gets it right, he wins the internet.
Still two announced papers.
>He does miss one aspect, however, which is that the FCC is the chief
>content censor in the United States.
Architectonically this is the hardware/software/brainware nature of a
business where competition replaced regulation on the condition of no
cross-subzidisation. Brainware revenues had not been considered, so
no one know if/how they can be regulated. FCC is therefore in need to
decide on a case per case without a metric. This is barely
acceptable, but no one has a solution yet.
> There's a reason for that besides
>mere jurisdiction: Their regulations are subject to public hearings
>and pressure which makes them a target for groups with extremely
>narrow cultural agendas.
In brainware subjective issues have the focus. Open source was
already a problem in software.
fasp4net spoke person
> Make someone king and someone will make a run
>for the castle.
> -Barry Shein
>The World | bzs at TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
>Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
>Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
>discuss mailing list
>discuss at 1net.org
More information about the discuss