[discuss] Root servers yet again (Re: Roadmap for globalizing IANA)

[McTim]

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Michel Gauthier <mg at telepresse.com> wrote:

>  At 15:44 04/03/2014, McTim wrote:
>
> Michel,
>
> I believe that most people on this list do not agree with your
> characterizations below, I for none, do not.
> the NTIA can't not approve new gTLDs, in other words, they must apply the
> rubber stamp..
>
>
> :-)
> Which treaty says that? They left the room in Dubai when this was raised
>


there is no treaty, nor does there need to be.

IIRC, this was not the reason for nation states not to sign on to the
agreement during WCIT.



>
>
>  - grand-parents make sure that parents raise their children correctly
> (they keep the root in turne with their demands)
> There is no mechanism for this to happen, it is prima facie false.
>
>
> Read Conrad.
>

I have. Perhaps you couold be more specific.  What is the mechanism by
which the USG keeps the root "in turne with their demands"?

I assume you are talking about USG as grandparents here.  What are their
demands you refer to?



>
>
>  - childs do what they want (if they do not bother to ask the parents)
> they declare their own additional nameservers.
> TLDs must change NS records via IANA, n'est-ce pas?
>
>
> :-)
> In which DNS world do you live?
>



The one that works globally, as opposed to the vaporware of "VGNICS".

IOW, the one that allows this email to find it's way to your inbox.

rgds,

McTim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140304/debb4245/attachment.html>