[discuss] Roadmap for globalizing IANA (clarification needed)
jcurran at istaff.org
Fri Mar 7 13:32:05 UTC 2014
On Mar 7, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Vinay Kesari <vinay.kesari at gmail.com> wrote:
> Assume this scenario (which might be a bit simplistic, but isn't implausible):
> The DNSA is set up in 2015 along the lines proposed, and ICANN and DNSA negotiate a 5 year agreement containing fairly standard, commercially acceptable terms. There are no disputes between the contracting parties during the term of the contract. However, between 2015 and 2019 global geopolitics results in certain countries effectively walking away from ICANN (and all other I* organisations) and setting up a 'competing' policy making body organised along multilateral lines (let's call it 'NewCo', shall we? :)). It is now 2019, and DNSA issues an RFP - it receives responses from ICANN and NewCo. DNSA now needs to make a decision on who to award the contract to.
> How would you see this scenario playing out, in process terms? What kind of selection procedure would DNSA use, considering that most objective criteria would automatically favour ICANN since it is the incumbent?
For clarity, do the countries that are "effectively walking away from ICANN (and
all other I* organisations)" also desire connectivity with those that are presently
following the I* organizations (i.e. a single Internet only with NewCo now performing
DNS policy development)? Or do they seek a distinctly separate 'internet' just for
those who wish to now follow NewCo for DNS policy development?
Disclaimer: My views alone. coffee is goodness.
More information about the discuss