[discuss] [governance] NTIA statement

Jeanette Hofmann jeanette at wzb.eu
Sun Mar 16 16:52:14 UTC 2014


If there was a contest for swanky acronyms in the IG cosmos, no doubt 
you would win it Wolfgang!
jeanette



Am 16.03.14 17:36, schrieb "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang":
> 1+ Adiel.
>
> A good performance of the IANA functions is a pre-condition that the
> Internet works and can be used by all kind of governmental and
> non_governmental players for good and bad things. The publication of
> a TLD zone file in the root doesn´t say anything what the Registrant
> of a domain name is doing with the domain. And it has nothing to do
> with third party´s attack on this domains by blocking, filtering,
> hacking, manipulating, spying etc.  The problem is that so far there
> not enough multi-stakeholder places where users and providers of
> services can go to look for (policy and technical) arrangements to
> counter bad things. This is one challenge for Net Mundial. It should
> discuss what on top of a multi-stakehoder managed technical layer
> (which includes the termination of the transition of the IANA
> function to the network of the multistakleholder I* organizations)
> should be done to have multi-stakehooder mechanisms on the
> content/political layer. We know that the two lyers are
> interconnected, but they are two different shoes. New
> multistakeholder policy mechanisms will not emerge over night. But
> Sao Paulo can start the process and deliver a Multistakeholder
> Internet Governance Roadmap 2020 (MINGORO 2020).
>
> wolfgang
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: discuss-bounces at 1net.org im Auftrag von Adiel Akplogan Gesendet:
> So 16.03.2014 13:47 An: Seun Ojedeji Cc: 1 Net List; Civil Society
> Internet Governance Caucus - IGC Betreff: Re: [discuss] [governance]
> NTIA statement
>
>
>
> I disagree as well. In this discussion it is very important to
> dissociate the USG/NTIA by role in the performance of IANA function
> by ICANN and the issue related to mass surveillance. The two are not
> technically linked and should be addressed separately.
>
> - a.
>
> On Mar 16, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Well I would not disagree that mass surveillance indeed continues.
>>
>> Any NSA statement that says otherwise?
>>
>> Cheers! sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>> On 15 Mar 2014 19:08, "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com> wrote:
>> Disagree,
>>
>> Different department.
>>
>> j
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Louis Pouzin (well)
>> <pouzin at well.com> wrote: Hi,
>>
>> The IANA ballyhoo comes from the same factory as the "internet
>> freedom" smoke screen launched before WCIT. It's a spin diversion
>> for the show.
>>
>> Mass surveillance continues. What's new ?
>>
>> Louis
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________ You
>> received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org To be removed from the list, visit:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance To edit your profile and
>> to find the IGC's charter, see: http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC -
>> http://wwwhatsup.com <http://wwwhatsup.com/> http://pinstand.com
>> <http://pinstand.com/>  - http://punkcast.com
>> <http://punkcast.com/> VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
>> <http://isoc-ny.org/>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------- -
>>
>> _______________________________________________ discuss mailing
>> list discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> _______________________________________________ discuss mailing
>> list discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



More information about the discuss mailing list