[discuss] surveillance governance, was Re: [governance] NTIA statement

Alejandro Pisanty apisanty at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 05:37:24 UTC 2014


Parminder,

I for one - and for once - agree with you on one point: no discussion yet
of how surveillance should be governed.

Time to come up with an agenda for that discussion, at least, and, it
seems, leaving ICANN, IANA and all that parasitary stuff to a side.

Now, as The Ugly said, "if you're going to talk, talk, if you're going to
shoot, shoot." Let's see the breakthrough happen.

What are the achievable rules, norms, agreements and mechanisms that can
shape the practice and evolution of governmental surveillance of
communications?

(Do note that I am forking the thread by a change in the "subject" line, in
line with what Greg Shatan, Nick Ashton-Hart and George Sadowsky have
proposed a couple of times.)

Alejandro Pisanty


On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:16 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>wrote:

>
> On Sunday 16 March 2014 09:51 PM, Victor Ndonnang wrote:
>
>> +1 Adiel.
>> Surveillance and intelligence agencies was there before the Internet. Even
>> if the Internet has a role in the mass surveillance...USG/NTIA intent to
>> transfer IANA and root zone management related to the global independent
>> Multistakeholder entity is not a response to the mass surveillance issue.
>>
>
> Agree, developments on the ICANN oversight issue do not constitute any
> real response to mass surveillance problem. And since NetMundial came out
> of a series of events directly connected to the mass surveillance problem,
> and which is the main reason the 'global community' invested into it, it is
> only fair to the people across the world that we have
>
> 1. discussions on this issues, and others related to larger international
> public policy issues pertaining to the Internet , and
> 2. come up with proposals regarding these issues.
>
> I have seen almost nil work on this list in this regard. ICANN oversight
> issue should not be allowed to overshadow  these much more important and
> pressing global public policy issues. I fear this is what is happening. A
> good reason of course is structural about what 1Net is.
>
> parminder
>
>  May be that Global Multistakeholder entity will be the IETF or I... to
>> help
>> strengthen security, privacy and trust on the Internet.
>> The Internet Governance is mainly a technical thing, let's leave the
>> technical community takes care of it with the full participation and
>> inputs
>> of others stakeholders.
>> Regards,
>> Victor.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] De la
>> part
>> de Adiel Akplogan
>> Envoyé : Sunday, March 16, 2014 8:48 AM
>> À : Seun Ojedeji
>> Cc : 1 Net List; Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus - IGC
>> Objet : Re: [discuss] [governance] NTIA statement
>>
>> I disagree as well. In this discussion it is very important to dissociate
>> the USG/NTIA by role in the performance of IANA function by ICANN and the
>> issue related to mass surveillance. The two are not technically linked and
>> should be addressed separately.
>>
>> - a.
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Well I would not disagree that mass surveillance indeed continues.
>>>
>>> Any NSA statement that says otherwise?
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> sent from Google nexus 4
>>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>>
>>> On 15 Mar 2014 19:08, "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com> wrote:
>>> Disagree,
>>>
>>> Different department.
>>>
>>> j
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Louis Pouzin (well) <pouzin at well.com>
>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The IANA ballyhoo comes from the same factory as the "internet freedom"
>>>
>> smoke screen launched before WCIT. It's a spin diversion for the show.
>>
>>> Mass surveillance continues. What's new ?
>>>
>>> Louis
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>       governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>       http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>
>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>       http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>       http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>
>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC -
>>> http://wwwhatsup.com  http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com  VP
>>> (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at 1net.org
>>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at 1net.org
>>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140316/d9060e3a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list