[discuss] ITU Statement w.r.t IANA Transition
lear at ofcourseimright.com
Mon Mar 17 18:13:11 UTC 2014
I don't read much into the statement other than, governments will have
their say. On this point:
On 3/17/14, 7:00 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> This does, however, show a mismatch between ICANN's proposed timeline
> that is focused all on ICANN meetings, and a wider expectation that
> NetMundial, and over appropriate venues will also be appropriate
> spaces (like maybe even the IGF) for this discussion.
> I think this will need to worked on by those responsible for
> orchestrating this transition. At this point I think the view that
> all discussions occur on ICANN turf is problematic.
I would hope that meetings take place where the key stakeholders are,
balanced by region where appropriate. Netmundial seems a good place for
dialog. So does Singapore. So too perhaps Amsterdam or Cancun, to name
but a few.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 551 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the discuss