[discuss] [governance] U.S. to Give Up Oversight of Web Policymaking Body
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Tue Mar 18 00:55:19 UTC 2014
From: Steve Crocker [mailto:steve at shinkuro.com]
>The actual obligation is to meet the needs of the community, particularly the several groups that depend >on the IANA publication of the unique identifiers. The IETF, the TLD operators, the RIRs and the root >operators all pay close attention to the IANA function and all have a strong say in the performance. These >accountability and feedback mechanisms are in place
Really? What are the accountability mechanisms by which, say, the IETF could bring the IANA-in-ICANN to account in the absence of the NTIA contract? What leverage does, say, a TLD operator hold over ICANN's IANA that could correct aberrant behavior (again assuming the NTIA contract disappears)?
We can rule out the following accountability mechanisms:
- they cannot shift their business to another service provider.
- they cannot sue you
- they cannot hire or fire staff
- they cannot recall the ICANN board
- they cannot vote in board elections
Unless I am mistaken, none of these options exist.
>NTIA's formal contract has been a visible but largely redundant overlay, and to the extent they have said >anything about the performance of the IANA function, they have been reflecting input given to them from >the same bodies.
Why would they be giving that input to NTIA, I wonder, rather than, say, the ICANN board?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss