[discuss] surveillance governance, was Re: [governance] NTIA statement

Nick Ashton-Hart nashton at ccianet.org
Tue Mar 18 15:33:33 UTC 2014

On 18 Mar 2014, at 07:32, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

> (1) Do you think a standing global mechanism is required to discuss and take necessary public action regarding the 'social layer' or public policy aspect of global governance of the Internet? Explain your yes or no.

No. As previously stated, various fora already exist and these should be leveraged; that's where the issue expertise is.

For more, see our submission at: http://content.netmundial.br/contribution/submission-to-the-global-stakeholder-meeting-on-the-future-of-internet-governance/248.

> (2) In case the answer to above is yes, what should be the nature of such standing mechanism, what should be its mandate and role, how should it be constituted, and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140318/164bae92/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140318/164bae92/signature.asc>

More information about the discuss mailing list