[discuss] surveillance governance, was Re: [governance] NTIA statement

[John Curran]

On Mar 18, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Mike Roberts <mmr at darwin.ptvy.ca.us> wrote:

> John -
> 
> I apologize to anyone on this list who thinks I was lumping them in a paranoid fringe.  I was referring to extreme statements from other sources.

No problem... (and we certainly _do_ have a colorful mix on this list :-)

I should reiterate that I dom't think that it is inevitable that anything 
needs to change with respect to ICANN simply as a result of an NTIA IANA 
contract transition, but do think that its better for us all to carefully 
consider the question now, so as to eliminate any possibility of regret in 
the future.

/John

Disclaimer: My views alone.