[discuss] FW: Comcast undertakes 9 year IETF cosponsorship!?

Joseph Alhadeff joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Sat Mar 22 19:32:56 UTC 2014


Ok, I will join the chorus asking to be removed from this thread.  Is this initiated by some action of mine or the list administrator?

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 22, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Jefsey <jefsey at jefsey.com> wrote:
> 
> At 18:29 22/03/2014, Shatan, Gregory S. wrote:
>> your accusations regarding IETF, ISOC and the multistakeholder organizations are quite outrageous and completely unsupported.
> 
> Dear Gregory,
> I understand you dislke Micahel's diagnosis but this is exactly what one can decide to read in RFC 3869 and RFC 6852 (the amount is there qualified as a "huge bounty"). Anyway this has no importance. The truth in this case is that it is what the majority of the world thinks (right or not) and that it is the situation we have to cope with. You (men of speech) with your words, us (VGN Managers) with our acts and decisions.
> 
>> I’m fairly confident that no matter what anyone does, says, or shows, you will stick to this worldview.  Since it would be a waste of time to crawl into the ditch with you and argue these points,
> 
> Yes. I know that as a lawyer this is your admirable job, to defend people. But in this case the task is not to defend anyone but to protect the whole multitude from hurting misunderstandings. Be sure, and this is not a good news, but it is the reality, that it will take time now before a foreign informant accepts to put his life at stake to inform the CIA or the NSA of something dangerous for you, or a country to trust US President's "evidences", or a non-US user to believe in the necessity of an ICANN single authoritative root file.
> 
>> I will install award you the first, inaugural “Tin Foil Beret” award.  As you can tell from the name, I didn’t expect that you would be the first winner, but as a resident of a quasi-Francophone country, you’re more than qualified on style as well as substance.
> 
> I am afraid this is ad personam and no more ad hominem. I am not sure of the reason why you allude to Francophones?
> jfc 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



More information about the discuss mailing list