[discuss] American For-Profit at the Heart of Internet
pranesh at cis-india.org
Mon Mar 24 04:44:04 UTC 2014
I'm curious about the scope of NTIA's instructions to ICANN to come up
with a transition proposal.
> As the first step, NTIA is asking the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to convene global stakeholders to develop a proposal to transition the current role played by NTIA in the coordination of the Internet’s domain name system (DNS).
A transition from NTIA's cooperative agreement with Verisign could mean
1. Verisign's counterpart in that agreement gets replaced.
2. Verisign gets replaced as the root zone maintainer.
I'm unclear why Verisign, an American for-profit subject to the whims of
ill-informed US lawmakers, should continue to hold on to its monopoly as
the root zone maintainer. But I'm also unclear whether (2) is within
the scope of NTIA's instructions.
The root zone operators with their place of incorporation and for-profit
Verisign (USA) (for profit)
USC-ISI (USA) (non-profit)
Cogent (USA) (for profit)
UMD (USA) (non-profit)
NASA-ARC (USA) (govt)
ISC (USA) (non-profit)
DOD-NIC (USA) (govt)
ARL (USA) (govt)
Netnod (Sweden) (non-profit)
RIPE NCC (The Netherlands / Europe) (non-profit)
ICANN (USA) (non-profit)
WIDE (Japan) (non-profit)
Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society
T: +91 80 40926283 | W: http://cis-india.org
Access to Knowledge Fellow, Information Society Project, Yale Law School
M: +1 520 314 7147 | W: http://yaleisp.org
PGP ID: 0x1D5C5F07 | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pranesh_prakash
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the discuss