[discuss] Opportunity for input on the development process forIANAoversight transition plan

Nick Ashton-Hart nashton at ccianet.org
Tue Mar 25 09:27:19 UTC 2014

It is an interesting idea, but almost certainly a non-starter, aside from anything else because it would have the USG chop and change from their announcement just made, which looks bad. The makeup of her group is also very, very heavily weighted towards incumbents, many of whom have a financial interest in the result, and I don't think that will work. 

On 25 Mar 2014, at 09:58, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:

> http://content.netmundial.br/contribution/one-possible-roadmap-for-iana-evolution/153
> Avri´s proposal for a IANA Stewarship Group is a good starter to avoid conflict of interest issues.
> wolfgang

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140325/faac8baf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140325/faac8baf/signature.asc>

More information about the discuss mailing list