[discuss] Whoops: Bad Link RE: Blogpost: The Multistakeholder Model, Neo-liberalism and Global (Internet) Governance
S Moonesamy
sm+1net at elandsys.com
Thu Mar 27 05:56:38 UTC 2014
Hi Mike,
At 17:36 26-03-2014, michael gurstein wrote:
>2014/03/26/the-multistakeholder-model-neo-liberalism-and-global-internet-governance/
From that link:
"Equally of course, the citizens of Less Developed Countries whose
governments
lack the knowledge and often the resources to act as effective
stakeholders in
MS processes; whose national Internet corporations are either
sub-units of global
corporations or too weak to be effective in such environments; and whose
Civil Society organizations have been captured by means of the
cheap baubles
of international travel, the flattery of 'participation' in
discussions with
Internet luminaries, along with the crumbs of localized
organizational benefits;
will (as with the disadvantaged populations in Developed
Countries) be completely
at the mercy of those in the Developed Countries and in those
small segments of
their own countries who have already achieved success in the
global Internet
sphere and stand to benefit enormously in prestige and otherwise
through the
dominance of multistakeholder governance processes.'
People in countries which are not part of the developed world are
well aware of the opportunities for travel experience. As for the
flattery of participation there is some awareness about that. It
seems that people from undeveloped countries are singled out in your message.
There is a previous article (March 21, 2013) which I'll quote:
"I'm currently, with others, working on behalf of the e-Africa
Directorate of
the African Union to find ways of further enabling the broadest base of
participation in a series of multistakeholder processes which I
consider to be
very successful in their domain."
Could you please provide some publicly available information so that
people can assess for themselves whether these ways of further
enabling the broadest base of participation have delivered any results?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
More information about the discuss
mailing list