[discuss] CircleID post: a way forward on what "Internet Governance" is, and is not
nathaliecoupet at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 29 21:07:39 UTC 2014
Applying Nick's definition, I believe the topics of spam, robustness of the Internet and network neutrality would fall under the categories covered by (non-Global) IG. Shouldn't we talk about that?
Could you please define the current situation with regards to these three subjects, the status of the work done in other fora (W3C for spam, perpass initiative update for robustness at the IETF,...).
What other perspective could we bring to the discussions occurring elsewhere?
From: Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton at ccianet.org>
To: "discuss at 1net.org List" <discuss at 1net.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:38 PM
Subject: [discuss] CircleID post: a way forward on what "Internet Governance" is, and is not
In case it is of interest, there's a CircleID post from me on why we need to have more clarity on what is, and is not, within the scope of "Internet Governance." I propose a way to resolve the vagueness that has bedeviled this term for 10 years built around the concept that the data that is carried by the Internet and the network that carries that data are separate things, and that data should not be a part of "Internet Governance" because it is dealt with in many other venues.
I hope it is of interest. It is on the front page at the moment but the direct link is http://www.circleid.com/posts/20140328_internet_governance_what_does_it_mean_anyway/.
Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)
Tel: +41 (22) 534 99 45
Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44
Mobile: +41 79 595 5468
USA Tel: +1 (202) 640-5430
email/IM (Jabber/GTalk): nashton at ccianet.org
Fingerprint: 4B53 1B20 0CA0 5C83 2555 187C 0895 CEE9 AB8C E773
Need to schedule a meeting or call with me? Feel free to pick a time and date convenient for you at http://meetme.so/nashton
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss