[discuss] List membership management (was: Net neutrality (censored input))

[Seun Ojedeji]

+1 not for only for mail exploder reasons but for content relevance sake as
it means that any mail discussed on fsp4net still gets delivered to IANA
(even if it's of no relevance to IANA transition discussion).
However, I think it's okay to subscribe the list address but set on
"receive only"

Regards
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 4 May 2014 13:53, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> Note: I trimmed the list I'm posting to just to the one that is
> community-managed.  But I think ICANN should apply this policy too.
>
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 02:46:31AM +0200, FSP4NET wrote:
>
> > All of the alliance members have an equal right to use this mail box
> […]
> > For a third day our repeated registration to the /1net and
> > IANAtransition mailing lists has not been acknowledged.
>
> I for one am grateful.  I see no reason why other lists ought to be
> posting to these lists.  That seems like an excellent way to create a
> mail exploder.
>
> If people want to post to the list, they can post as themselves, not
> as some collective address.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140504/5b74ac12/attachment.html>