[discuss] List membership management

[Seun Ojedeji]

I think that question goes either way; what has using multiple emails by
one person produced so far? Except that I have perhaps referring to a non
existing name. - you know those feelings that comes when you call someone
by name and then you suddenly realised that wasn't it's name afterall.
For me I am not against using multiple email, but I am against using
multiple identities by one person.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 6 May 2014 02:50, "Michel Gauthier" <mg at telepresse.com> wrote:

> At 22:12 05/05/2014, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>> Indeed. And one-person one-name seems to be a vital rule to avoid
>> falsifying the debate.
>>
>
> Dont you think that confusing /2NET with a debate is precisely what
> falsifies the MS process? Could you please indicate who is then the ICANN,
> ISOC, IAB, IETF, W3C, ITU, IEEE, RIR one person who shoualong you
> participate to the MS process concerning the IANA transition?
>
> My understanding of this list now is that there are people who want to
> work and build a real project with its real stakeholders and those who only
> want to chat with other chatters.
>
> Question is: what has the one-person one-mail-name module produced so far
> irt. the internet use satisfaction? I am just asking. I try to figure out
> what MSism is and what non
>
> M G
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140506/446b22b1/attachment.html>