Michel S. Gauthier
mg at telepresse.com
Sat May 10 22:37:28 UTC 2014
At 15:10 10/05/2014, Avri Doria wrote:
>I think a formula that combines:
>- coordinating bodies, of some TBD composition, with some limited
>decision making capabilities, not only for transition but as part of
>the long term solution
This seems a reverberation of the modern standardization paradigm.
>- and accessible appeals mechanism paths, both internal and
>external. With some of them being advisory and some binding.
However, the particularity of this modern paradigm is that the
network technology is specified by the markets (plural) of multiple
"global communities". Don't you think that the ultimate judge are the
>- with agreed upon levels of seperation
An MS agreement can result from a formal decision or from the
emergence of a consensus from the markets. Which one would you
advise? Sao Paulo like influenced meetings, ICANN selfpromotion
campaign, crowd choosing, or others?
M S G
>should be looked at for accountability.
More information about the discuss